Early American speaking man was a very selfish being – when a person accomplished something great or interesting, they were generally conned into believing that others were happy for them. This basic con was given free of charge and not really thought about, because being well-mannered came along with selfishness back then.
Especially within the educated classes.
Newspaper writers of the day saw the need for one word in these situations instead of many.
“Tom Amderson deserves compliments for having sold a rocking chair to the President.” and sentences like it, were tiresome. Wouldn’t it be easier to just say “_________ Tom?”
So a summit was held by a small group of journalists to figure out an appropriate word for pretending to be happy for someone… the following is a summation of the transcript from the event.
“A person wins something.”
“What do you do with a winner?”
“What do the bitches do with a winner?”
“They adore a winner. Losers are despised.”
“Okay….let’s work with that.”
“Love”
“Adore”
“Said that already.”
“Flatter”
“Anybody have a synonym dictionary?”
“Here we go, here we go – adulation.”
“Okay cool, we’ve got a definition for what we want: to freely con somebody into believing you’re an adulator.”
“Got it, got it”
“Alright?”
“Congratulations”
“Holy shit, that sounds great.”
“Yeah, I know. con + gratis + adulation”
“People will eat this word up.”
“We’re going to be famous.”